000			01582naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6082815083921
003			OSt
005			20190211161148.0
008			060828s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aWIMMER, Kurt _927518
245	1	0	_aToward a world rule of law : _bfreedom of expression
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJanuary 2006
520	3		_aFreedom of expression is guaranteed by international treaties, but countries differ significantly in their view of the meaning of "free expression" and how it should be protected. Before the emergence of the Internet, each country could workably set its own ceiling for the protection of expression without having an adverse impact on other countries that might make a different choice. The borderless nature of the Internet makes it more difficult for despots and dictators to limit the access of their citizens to information from outside their countries' borders. But the conflict represented by this medium expresses itself in legitimate disputes over the application of national law. Each nation must apply its own rules of law without diminishing the freedoms available to citizens of other states. This article suggests that nations focus on applying the law of the country in which speech originates, following the view of the European Union.
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g603, p. 202-216 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, January 2006 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060828 _b1508^b _cNatália
998			_a20100803 _b1055^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19176 _d19176
041			_aeng