000			01403naa a2200193uu 4500
001			6082816592721
003			OSt
005			20190211161154.0
008			060828s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBERKE, Philip R. _927545
245	1	0	_aPlanning for postdisaster resiliency
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cMarch 2006
520	3		_aThe focus of this article is planning for resiliency in the aftermath of a catastrophe. First, the authors offer their conception of planning for resiliency as a goal for recovering communities, and the benefits of planning in efforts to create more resilient places. Next, they discuss major issues associated with planning for postdisaster recovery, including barriers posed by federal and state governments to planning for resiliency, the promise and risks of compact urban form models for guiding rebuilding, and the failure to involve citizens in planning for disasters. Finally, they discuss lessons from prior research that address these issues and policy recommendations that foster predisaster recovery planning for resilient communities.
700	1		_aCAMPANELLA, Thomas J. _927546
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g604, p. 192-207 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, March 2006 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20060828 _b1659^b _cNatália
998			_a20100803 _b1051^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19196 _d19196
041			_aeng