000 | 02319naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6102421044923 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211161210.0 | ||
008 | 061024s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPELLISSERY, Sony _927840 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aDoes multi-level governance meet local aspirations? The case of social protection needs in rural india |
260 |
_aHong Kong : _bDepartment of Politics and Public Administration University of Hong Kong, _cJune 2006 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe concept of decentralisation has often been used to study whether " decision space" is devolved to the lower tiers of administration from central government. The new tool of " multi-level governance" examines the nature of " decision space" in the context of a cauldron of political voices at the local level. The decision space of the state may be constrained by the interaction of state actors with non-state actors. Taking the issue of social protection needs inthe rural areas of the Indian satate os Maharashtra, this article examines how lwer level bureaucrats determine the "need" of social protection for the claimants. Both the estate and non-satate sectors were studied through fieldwork of eight months in 2003-04 using an actor-oriented method of the sociology of development. In essence, access to public funds is conditional on people's relationships with local elites rather than their eligibility for the funds. Local elites measure the " needs" through informal rules of the community and dominate the bureaucrats in decision-making, who insist on the interpretation of legal principles at lower levels of administration. This process excludes over 60 percent of eligible persons to gain public funds. While the responsability of bureaucrats is diffused in different levels of administration, the local elites are able to draw loyalty solely for themselves. The effective devolution of political power, creating an extensive network of political elites, seems to constrain the devolved administrative power | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration _g28, 1, p. 25-40 _dHong Kong : Department of Politics and Public Administration University of Hong Kong, June 2006 _xISSN 0259-8272 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20061024 _b2104^b _cCarolina |
||
998 |
_a20061024 _b2110^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19519 _d19519 |
||
041 | _aeng |