000			01707naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6111316134521
003			OSt
005			20190211161328.0
008			061113s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSVARA, James H. _910445
245	1	0	_aComplementarity of politics and administration as a legitimate alternative to the dichotomy model
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJanuary 1999
520	3		_aAlthough the politics-administration dichotomy model has frequently been presented as historically important but conceptually and empirically faulty, the criticisms have missed two fundamental points. First, it is not—as commonly presumed—the founding theory of public administration in the United States but rather a poorly grounded characterization of the early literature that took hold in the late 1950s. The term dichotomy was rarely used before that time and never used by the "founders" of the field who were supposed to have invented the model. Second, there is an alternative model of complementarity that has been present in the literature from Wilson onward. It stresses interdependency, reciprocal influence, and extensive interaction between elected officials and administrators along with recognition of the need for distinct roles and political supremacy. The politics-administration complementarity model—elaborated here with references to the "old" public administration literature prior to 1960—offers a strong foundation on which we can build
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g30, 6, p. 676-705 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, January 1999 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20061113 _b1613^b _cNatália
998			_a20100805 _b1712^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19770 _d19770
041			_aeng