000 | 01671naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6111316340721 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211161330.0 | ||
008 | 061113s1999 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSTEVER, James A. _910349 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aThe glass firewall between military and civil administration |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cMarch 1999 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThere is a glass-like firewall between American military administration and civil administration forged during the Progressive era. Turn-of-the-century public administration theory was quite ecumenical. However, under the spell of Progressive state theory, post-war public administration theory assumed that civil administrators could ignore military matters. The separation of military and civil administration is now beginning to adversely affect the American people. The Department of Defense conceived a Total Force Doctrine that was neither substantially discussed with nor understood by civilian administrators. When this doctrine was applied by the Department of Defense in Operation Desert Storm, predictable negative civilian consequences occurred. The glass firewall must go. Progressive state theory and administrative state theory were wrong in assuming that these tensions would vanish as the state modernized. Public administration must address this scission. In doing so, public administration can recover its ecumenical root and the relevance of the field | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAdministration & Society _g31, 1, p. 28-49 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, March 1999 _xISSN 00953997 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20061113 _b1634^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20100805 _b1558^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19775 _d19775 |
||
041 | _aeng |