000 | 01684naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 6111417372121 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240627173453.0 | ||
008 | 061114s1998 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_916639 _aDurant, Robert F. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aAgenda setting, the "third wave," and the administrative state |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJuly 1998 |
||
520 | 3 | _aOn the eve of a new millennium, the United States appears bent on diffusing the administrative states (Waldo) authority to address social problems throughout the public, market, and civic spheres. Ascendant presently in informing this "neoadministrative" state is a "downsizing, defunding, and devolution" (D3) agenda premised on behavioral, instrumental, and normative assumptions that are not so much wrong as seriously incomplete. This article argues that appropriately matching the metes and bounds of the neoadministrative state with the challenges posed by Third Wave transformations will elude the United States unless an alternative agenda is offered. This agenda must go beyond one-size-fits-all prescriptions, be better informed by empirically based research, and be culturally resonant with the values Lipset identifies as the "American Creed." To this end, the rudiments ofand important questions posed bya "reconnecting, reconceptualizing, and reengaging" (R3) agenda are offered, which may yet reframe debates over the neoadministrative state in the 21st century | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAdministration & Society _g30, 3, p. 211-247 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 1998 _xISSN 00953997 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20061114 _b1737^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20100805 _b1545^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19830 _d19830 |
||
041 | _aeng |