000			01400naa a2200229uu 4500
001			6112209141923
003			OSt
005			20190211161410.0
008			061122s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLAZAR, Nomi Claire _928304
245	1	0	_aMust exceptionalism prove the rule? an angle on emergency government in the history of political thought
260			_aLondon : _bSage Publications, _cJune 2006
520	3		_aDiscussions of the problem of emergency powers often assume that norms and exceptions constitute its conceptual structure. This perspective is both self-undermining and dangerous. Because even the critics of emergency powers often rely on this dichotomy, clarifying the conceptual terrain might contribute to the development of a safer approach to emergencies. Hence, this article explores the origins and logic of modern exceptionalism by examining instances of its careful articulation in the history of political thought: in the "republican" exceptionalism of Machiavelli and Rousseau and the "decisionist" exceptionalism of Schmitt and Hobbes
650		4	_aemergency _928305
650		4	_astate of exception _928306
650		4	_aSchmitt _928307
650		4	_aMachiavelli _928308
650		4	_arights _912388
773	0	8	_tPolitics & Society _g34, 2, p. 245-275 _dLondon : Sage Publications, June 2006 _xISSN 0032-3292 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20061122 _b0914^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19903 _d19903
041			_aeng