000			01906naa a2200193uu 4500
001			6112213293723
003			OSt
005			20190211161413.0
008			061122s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHOULE, France _928352
245	1	0	_aTribunals and guidelines : _bexploring the relationship between fairness and legitimacy in administrative decision-making
260			_aToronto : _b IPAC Institute of Public Administration of Canada, _c2006
520	3		_aThe objective of this paper is to address two questions: why do administrative tribunals such as the Immigration Refugee Board resort to developing guide-lines, and what are the principles and values which legitimize these initiatives? The role of tribunals in policy-making and/or policy implementing raises important questions. For example, to whom are tribunals accountable for the development and application of guidelines where the functions of a tribunal - especially the adjudicative functions - are intended to be independent of government?The authors seek to understand better the dynamics of tribunals' role in the policy process. They propose a classification of guidelines based on the function they perform in administrative proceedings and provide an analysis of the normative framework underlying guidelines. The authors explore how a legal analysis of guidelines might shed on the theory and practice of public administration. The authors conclude that in the absence of a nuanced understanding of the legal status of guidelines, the relationship between administrative practice and the rule of law remains uncertain and unstable
700	1		_aSOSSIN, Lorne _922391
773	0	8	_tCanadian Public Administration _g49, 3, p. 282-307 _dToronto : IPAC Institute of Public Administration of Canada, 2006 _xISSN 0008-4840 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20061122 _b1329^b _cCarolina
998			_a20070207 _b1518^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c19931 _d19931
041			_aeng