000			01394naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6112715011921
003			OSt
005			20190211161433.0
008			061127s1997 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLEAZES JR, Francis J. _928444
245	1	0	_aPublic accountability : _bis it a private responsibility?
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 1997
520	3		_aPublic law principles must be paramount in designing and implementing privatized administrative arrangements. Private nonprofit organizations are a familiar part of the public administration landscape. A case study demonstrates how public accountability is diminished when government arranges a service, leaving implementation to a private, nonprofit agency, but public law principles are not central to the contractual arrangement. Ineffective policy implementation, blurred lines of executive accountability, and diminished management capacity resulted Administration by civil suit was substituted. Private administrators are seen as having constitutional responsibilities, constraints on discretion, and obligations to be open to public scrutiny and government regulatory oversight
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g29, 4, p. 395-411 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 1997 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20061127 _b1501^b _cNatália
998			_a20100805 _b1643^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c20005 _d20005
041			_aeng