000			01678naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6120615214621
003			OSt
005			20190211161453.0
008			061206s1996 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aFORRESTER, John P. _928802
245	1	0	_aPublic administration productivity : _ban assessment of faculty in PA programs
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cFebruary 1996
520	3		_aThis article examines the relative frequency of contributions made by faculty members in public administration programs to the professional public administration journals. With the call for a leaner and more productive government sector (e.g., universities), the profession needs to know which programs are producing most of the cutting-edge knowledge, the research strengths of these programs, and where they publish. More specifically, the analysis draws on evidence from articles found in highly ranked journals to reflect on relative productivity using four categories of measures: which schools (a) publish the greatest number of articles in the journals, (b) publish the greatest number of single-authored equivalent articles in the journals, (c) publish the greatest number of articles in the "best" journals, and (d) publish the greatest number of single-authored equivalent articles in the best journals. Together, the findings offer a comprehensive view of public administration faculty productivity in central public administration journals
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g27, 4, p. 537-566 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, February 1996 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20061206 _b1521^b _cNatália
998			_a20100805 _b1657^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c20382 _d20382
041			_aeng