000			01513naa a2200181uu 4500
001			6120615433121
003			OSt
005			20190211161500.0
008			061206s1996 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aDUNSIRE, Andrew _928816
245	1	0	_aTipping the balance : _bautopoiesis and governance
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cNovember 1996
520	3		_aA modern society, according to autopoietic and other analyses, comprises social systems that show organizational closure and selfrreferentiality, partly explaining widely perceived regulatory failure. This article compares four possible mechanisms for governance or steering of such systems, compatible with their autopoiesis: the use of subsidy, partnership with intermediary bodies, reflexive law, and a technique of government intervention that is ancient and common but not recognized, here named collibration. Some social actors exist mainly to check and balance other actors (e.g., employers' organizations and trade unions, or buyers and sellers in a market) and are self-referential only as a pair system This pair system is then self-policing but can be steered, within limits, by tipping the balance that is being maintained-as exemplified by price-loading taxes, cooling-off periods, and sport handicapping
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g28, 3, p. 299-334 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, November 1996 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20061206 _b1543^b _cNatália
998			_a20100805 _b1633^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c20399 _d20399
041			_aeng