| 000 | 01868naa a2200253uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 6121916184221 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20220916062543.0 | ||
| 008 | 061219s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aEDQUIST, Kristin _929257 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEU social-policy governance : _badvocating activism or servicing states? |
| 260 |
_aNew York, NY : _bRoutledge, _cJune 2006 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis article examines the implications of EU governance tools for social activism in Europe, specifically whether benchmarking, best practices, the open method of co-ordination, or mainstreaming delimit the kinds of activism non-governmental and other organizations can pursue under EU auspices. This is possible because EU governance models give member states ultimate discretion on the design and implementation of EU social policies, and EU governance principles are based on specific normative commitments. I explore whether EU governance therefore renders activist confrontation of states unlikely, constrains policy participants' learning, particularly of perceived radical lessons, or allows only state-led challenges to market and social structures. To the extent that any of these dynamics entails EU governance, the models should be viewed with caution, and European social activists should be prepared to choose between conceding to state agendas or working outside EU governance margins. Cases include EU gender and social inclusion policies. | |
| 650 | 4 |
_911965 _aPolítica Social |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aVoluntariado _912728 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aGovernança _911938 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aTerceiro Setor _913013 |
|
| 650 | 4 |
_aEngenharia Reversa _913272 |
|
| 651 | 4 |
_aEuropa _912887 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of European Public Policy _g13, 4, p. 500 - 518 _dNew York, NY : Routledge, June 2006 _xISSN 1466-4429 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20061219 _b1618^b _cNatália |
||
| 998 |
_a20101214 _b1623^b _cKeicielle |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c20852 _d20852 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||