000			01836naa a2200193uu 4500
001			6122116135921
003			OSt
005			20190211161923.0
008			061221s2006 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKEELE, Luke _929410
245	1	0	_aValue Conflict and Volatility in Party Identification
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cOctober 2006
520	3		_aAre some people more prone to instabilities in partisanship due to the ways they rank and organize their core values? We investigate the mechanisms of partisan volatility, considering whether instabilities reflect value conflict and ambivalence. Our expectation is that when the basic values of the American ethos come into conflict in elite discourse, citizens have difficulty reconciling their own value arrangement with that of elites, resulting in greater partisan volatility. To this end, we use several heteroscedastic regression and ordered probit models to explore whether the conflict of competing values explains the response variance and instability of individual-level partisanship and ideology over time. To construct measures of value conflict, we rely on data from the 1992, 1994 and 1996 American National Election Studies. We find that, while instabilities in partisan identification reflect low information for some, the competition of core values generates volatility in partisan affiliations for others. In deliberating the value tradeoffs of politics, people may be of two minds even about central beliefs such as party identification.
700	1		_aWOLAK, Jennifer _929411
773	0	8	_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g36, 4, p. 671-690 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, October 2006 _xISSN 0007-1234 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20061221 _b1613^b _cNatália
998			_a20081031 _b1105^b _cZailton
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c20998 _d20998
041			_aeng