000			01900naa a2200205uu 4500
001			7010315431421
003			OSt
005			20190212102826.0
008			070103s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100	1		_aHERRMANN, Richard K. _929607
245	1	0	_aMass Public Decisions to Go to War : _bA Cognitive-Interactionist Framework
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cSeptember 1999
520	3		_aHow do Americans decide whether their country should use military force abroad? We argue they combine dispositional preferences and ideas about the geopolitical situation. This article reports the results of a representative national survey that incorporated five experiments. Findings include the following: (1) Respondent dispositions, especially isolationism versus internationalism and assertiveness versus accommodativeness, consistently constrained policy preferences, whereas liberalism-conservatism did not; (2) features of the geopolitical context--the presence of US. interests, relative power, the images of the adversary's motivations, and judgments about cultural status--also influenced support for military intervention; and (3) systematic interactions emerged between dispositions and geopolitical context that shed light on when and why ideological disagreements about the use of force are likely to be amplified and attenuated by situational factors. Our results are consistent with a cognitive-interaction ist perspective, in which people adapt broad predispositions in relatively thoughtful ways to specific foreign policy problems.
700	1		_aTETLOCK, Philip E. _910603
700	1		_aVISSER, Penny S _929608
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g93, 3, p. 553-574 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, September 1999 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070103 _b1543^b _cNatália
998			_a20070105 _b1727^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c21150 _d21150
041			_apor