000			01785naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7010315580821
003			OSt
005			20190211162026.0
008			070103s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBOOTH, W. James _91297
245	1	0	_aCommunities of memory : _bon identity, memory, and debt
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cJune 1999
520	3		_aIn looking at political identity from the standpoint of continuity across time, of memory, and of responsibility for the past, I am principally concerned with political identity and moral accountability. Identity statements often appear as propositions about current values, institutions, and so on, but I will treat them here as something more than present-tense descriptions of our culture or political life.(1) I will also treat their moral-political content as extending beyond demands for recognition. Identity claims, when pushed, characteristically seek something else: to establish the sameness, the continuity, of a person or community across time and in the face of apparent change. Central for the discussion here is that these claims typically also have a moral-temporal dimension: They ground ideas of attribution and responsibility, for deeds past and for the future. What I discuss, then, are the ways in which we think of a political community as existing continuously over time and as therefore being the subject of attribution, responsible for the past, which belongs to it, and accountable for a future that is also its.
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g93, 2, p. 249-264 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, June 1999 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070103 _b1558^b _cNatália
998			_a20070105 _b1726^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c21159 _d21159
041			_aeng