000 | 01316naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7010317373321 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211162035.0 | ||
008 | 070103s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aGROSECLOSE, Tim _94372 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aComparing interest group scores across time and chambers; adjusted ADA scores for the U.S. Congress |
260 |
_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cMarch 1999 |
||
520 | 3 | _aWithout question, the 1974 House elections that brought an influx of "Watergate babies" caused the House to become more liberal. Despite this, however, both the median and mean rating of House members by the conservative interest group Americans for Constitutional Action (ACA) rose between 1974 and 1975 (Groseclose 1994). While a naive comparison of ACA scores from these two years would suggest that the House became more conservative, the perverse result is surely due instead to the ACA shifting its scales, not to a true change in House preferences. | |
700 | 1 |
_aLEVITT, Steven D. _929629 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSNYDER JR., James M _929630 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAmerican Political Science Review _g93, 1, p. 33-50 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, March 1999 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20070103 _b1737^b _cNatália |
||
998 |
_a20070105 _b1732^b _cNatália |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c21176 _d21176 |
||
041 | _aeng |