000			01247naa a2200169uu 4500
001			7010517433321
003			OSt
005			20190211162132.0
008			070105s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKAUFMAN, Alexander _929735
245	1	0	_aHegel and the ontological critique of liberalism
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cDecember 1997
520	3		_aIs some form of identification with ethical norms and institutions a necessary condition of viable social life? If so, what form of identification is required? Contemporary communitarian theory argues for a particular form, which I will call strong identification. Because liberalism is unable to ground strong identification, communitarians suggest, it offers a flawed conception of ethical life. I will argue that, while some form of identification may in fact be necessary to ground viable social life, communitarian arguments requiring strong identification are unfaithful to the Hegelian insights which motivate communitarian thought.
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g91, 4, p. 807-818 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, December 1997 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070105 _b1743^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c21285 _d21285
041			_aeng