000			01734naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7010811290521
003			OSt
005			20190211162137.0
008			070108s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGOLDSTEIN, Joshua S. _929754
245	1	0	_aReciprocity, buillying, and International Corporation : _btime-series Analysis of the Bosnia Conflict
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cSeptember 1997
520	3		_aAlthough the role of reciprocity in international cooperation is central to neoliberal institutionalism, empirical understanding of the concept remais weak. We analyze strategic response patterns-- the use of reciprocity or inverse response (bullyng)-- in the Bosnia conflict from 1992 to 1995. We construct weekly time series of conflict and cooperation among the parties to the Bosnia war, using machine-coded events data. Time-series statistical analysis identifies several important patterns of strategic response, both reciprocal and inverse . These include bilateral responses, which are central to the concepts of reciprocity and evolution of cooperation, and triangular responses, which are central to the debates on containment versus accommodation in regional conflicts. Specifically, Serb forces displayed inverse triangular response, cooperating toward Bosnia after being punished by NATO. Outside powers displayed triangular reciprocity, increasing hostility toward Serb forces after Serbian attacks on the Bosnian government.
700	1		_aPEVEHOUSE, Jon C _929755
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g91, 3, p. 515-530 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, September 1997 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070108 _b1129^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c21302 _d21302
041			_aeng