000			01567naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7010813363921
003			OSt
005			20190211162148.0
008			070108s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGERBER, Scott D. _929782
245	1	0	_aThe quixotic search for consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court : _ba cross-judicial empirical analysis of the Rehnquist court justices
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cJune 1997
520	3		_aIn this first systematic and extensive application of cross-judicial methodology, we examine the members of the Rehnquist Court (1986-94 terms) with prior appellate court experience to discern any correlation with their Supreme Court behavior in terms of nonconsensual opinion writing and voting We find that they become less consensual as justices than they were as judges in the lower court. Importantly, this finding holds after controlling for such institutional differences between the two court levels as size, ideology, case types, stare decisis, and norms. Consistent with the neoinstitutional perspective, we surmise that this behavior change is due to the modern Supreme Court being unique, a court on which the members feel it is desirable, necessary, and possible to express policy disagreements with the majority via separate opinions and votes.
700	1		_aPARK, Keeok _929783
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g91, 2, p. 390-408 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, June 1997 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070108 _b1336^b _cNatália
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c21323 _d21323
041			_aeng