000			01711naa a2200193uu 4500
001			7011617120910
003			OSt
005			20190211162315.0
008			070116s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aNAGEL, Jack H. _922393
245	1	0	_aPartisan effects of voter turnout in senatorial and gubernatorial elections
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cDecember 1996
520	3		_aConventional wisdom holds that higher turnout favors Democrats. Previous studies of this hypothesis rely on presidential and House elections or on survey data, but senatorial and gobernatorial elections offer better conditions for directly testing turnout effects in U.S. politics. In a comprehensive analysis of these statewide elections since 1928, we find that the conventional theory was true outside the South through 1964, but since 1965 the overall relationship between turnout and partisan outcomes has been insignificant. Even before the mind-1960s, the turnout effect outside the South was strongest in Republican states and insignificant or negative in heavily Democratic states. A similar but waker pattern obtains after 1964. In the South, wich we analyze only size 1966, higher turnout helped Republicans until 1990, but in 1990-94 the effect became pro-Democratic. The conventional theory cannot account for these complex patterns, but they are impressively consistent with DeNardo´s (1980) theory
700	1		_aMCNULTY, John E _923341
773	0	8	_tAmerican Political Science Review _g90, 4, p. 780-793 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, December 1996 _xISSN 0003-0554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070116 _b1712^b _cTiago
998			_a20070116 _b1758^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c21860 _d21860
041			_aeng