000 | 01767naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7011919245810 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211162335.0 | ||
008 | 070119s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHALPIN, Darren R _930475 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe participatory and democratic potential and practice of interest groups : _bbetween solidarity and representation |
260 |
_aCanberra, AustrĂ¡lia : _bBlackwell Publishing, _cDecember 2006 |
||
520 | 3 | _aEmbracing 'groups' as means to address democratic deficiencies invites scrutiny of their democratic practices. However, many groups lack internal democratic practices and offer few opportunities for affiliates to participate. Guided by an implicit 'representation' narrative of groups, the absence of internal democratic practices is interpreted as a sign of 'failure' or 'deficiency'. Some scholars have entertained the idea of setting minimum standards of internal democracy as a prerequisite for policy access. This article scrutinizes this emerging consensus and its 'representation' narrative. Drawing upon the work of O'Neill (2001) and Pitkin (1967), it is argued that groups can also be viewed through a lens of solidarity. This paper argues that the type of constituency a group advocates for can be used to calibrate expectations of internal democratic structures of accountability and authorization. The concepts of 'representation' and 'solidarity' are used to make sense of the (changeable) practices of a variety of groups | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration : an international quarterly _g84, 4, p. 919-940 _dCanberra, AustrĂ¡lia : Blackwell Publishing, December 2006 _xISSN 0033-3298 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20070119 _b1924^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20070123 _b1122^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22002 _d22002 |
||
041 | _aeng |