000			01803naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7012316520710
003			OSt
005			20190211162337.0
008			070123s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aNAGEL, Peter _930517
245	1	0	_aPolicy games and Venu Shopping : _bworking the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in rehabilitation services
260			_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cDecember 2006
520	3		_aHow should bureaucrats engage effectively and ethically with stakeholders to achieve legitimate policy change? This essay draws upon findings from a case study of the introduction of an evidence-based rehabilitation program for injured workers with soft-tissue injuries in a workers' compensation jurisdiction in Australia. Despite initial enthusiasm for collaborative policy reform, clinical associations soon withdrew their support. In a classic case of venue-shopping, a coalition of clinical associations formed in opposition to the foundation principles of the proposed policy, overturning the bureaucrats' preferred consultation strategy: a think-tank comprising of invited clinical experts. The policy game turned from highly cooperative to fiercely competitive. These policy upheavals are interpreted through the lens of two theoretical perspectives: Sabatier's Advocacy Coalition framework, and Scharpf's Actor-centred Institutionalism framework. The contrasts in perspectives are melded into propositions for bureaucrats seeking to engage with stakeholders in a contested policy drama
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g65, 4, p. 3-16 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, December 2006 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070123 _b1652^b _cTiago
998			_a20070319 _b1827^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22050 _d22050
041			_aeng