000 01512naa a2200241uu 4500
001 7013118201723
003 OSt
005 20190211162452.0
008 070131s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aREGINE, Birute.
_930849
245 1 0 _aThird possibility leaders :
_b
260 _aWest Yorkshire, England :
_bMCB University Press,
_c2003
520 3 _aComplexity science may be described as a feminine science because it demands holistic thinking, something that women are generally better at than men. A total of 50 women leaders in the USA, Canada, Australia, and the UK were interviewed, women who displayed what is called “third possibility leadership”, that is they were able to hold masculine and feminine values and behaviors in dynamic balance. Finds that they displayed characteristics in common: they were “paradoxical”, they gathered people together, they were “wholistic” thinkers, and they displayed well-developed “relational intelligence”. Although they were effective leaders, their style of leadership was often invisible, and even demeaned, for socio-cultural reasons
650 4 _aBehaviour
_930850
650 4 _aLeadership
_916955
650 4 _aOrganizations
_917806
650 4 _aWomen
_917827
700 1 _aLEWIN, Roger
_930851
773 0 8 _tThe Learning Organization : an international journal
_g10, 6, p. 347-352
_dWest Yorkshire, England : MCB University Press, 2003
_xISSN 0969-6474
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20070131
_b1820^b
_cCarolina
998 _a20070215
_b1628^b
_cZailton
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c22365
_d22365
041 _aeng