000			01584naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7020516021423
003			OSt
005			20190211162514.0
008			070205s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHAWKES, David _930907
245	1	0	_aTwo models of contemporary public service wage determination in Australia
260			_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cJune 1999
520	3		_aRather than taking Louise Thornthwaite and Robyn Hollander (AJPA June 1998) to task, I need to chide them gently for failing to acknowledge two other jurisdictions in Australia – the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory. Had they canvassed the Northern Territory's experience, they may well have concluded that there are in fact three models of public sector wage determination, not two. They may have also concluded that the Northern Territory's rather unique adaptation of the federal system under the Workplace Relations Act represents something more than an approach dictated by its relatively small size and that it arguably represents the best of both the other models. May I suggest that Thornthwaite and Hollander, or others, could usefully explore the question as to whether the approaches adopted by the various jurisdictions have produced worthwhile results for both employers and employees
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g58, 2, p. 110-111 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, June 1999 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070205 _b1602^b _cCarolina
998			_a20070823 _b1049^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22441 _d22441
041			_aeng