000 | 01390naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7020518141623 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211162520.0 | ||
008 | 070205s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aTHOMPSON, Elaine _930942 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCaught the act : _b |
260 |
_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited , _cMarch 1999 |
||
520 | 3 | _aWhile any discussion of ministerial responsibility must in part focus on ministerial resignations, finding out when ministers resign is only the tip of the iceberg. A full assessment of ministerial responsibility would look at the relations between ministers and their senior bureaucrats, as discussed in Bill Blick's article. It would look at the impact of managerialism on ministerial accountability, especially in the light of privatisation and contracting out. It would assess the impact of other mechanisms of accountability, including the senate. The subject of this article must always be put into a broader context. This article concentrates on ministerial resignations drawing on evidence from Britain, Canada, the federal government in Australia and the government of New South Wales. When do ministers resign? | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g58, 1, p. 48-57 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited , March 1999 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20070205 _b1814^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22455 _d22455 |
||
041 | _aeng |