000			01419naa a2200169uu 4500
001			7020815404123
003			OSt
005			20190211162542.0
008			070208s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBYGRAVE, Louise _931020
245	1	0	_aJudicial decisions and policy
260			_aOxford : _bBlacwell Publishers Limited, _cMarch 1998
520	3		_aThis symposium debates the impact of High Court decisions by questioning whether the High Court has the constitutional and legislative authority (and possibly the moral right) to decide policy issues and determine the rights of citizens. Arguments on the role of the High Court vary from views that the High Court provides a sphere in which political interests may be lobbied to notions that its role is solely to interpret the Australian Constitution. However, what occurs when the political aspirations of government are in conflict with the decisions of the High Court? Should the High Court adapt judicial decisions to changing social views, or consider the implications of their decisions on the executive and legislature? What is the constitutional role of the High Court? These questions are explored in detail in the following articles
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g57, 1, p. 68-69 _dOxford : Blacwell Publishers Limited, March 1998 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070208 _b1540^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22543 _d22543
041			_aeng