000			01563naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7020915581923
003			OSt
005			20190211162551.0
008			070209s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aAHLUWALIA, Pal. _931067
245	1	0	_a'Political correctness' : _b
260			_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cSeptember 1998
520	3		_aIn Australia there has been a great deal of discussion in recent years of something called 'political coorectness'.This term is an insidious phrase applied to academic humanists, who, it is frequently said, do not think independently but rather according to norms established by a cabal of 'correct-thinking' leftists. These norms are supposed to be overly sensitive to racism, sexism and the like, instead of allowing people to debate in what is supposed to be an 'open'manner(Said 1994:58). This article asks why Australia has witnessed a backlash against 'political correcyness' at this point of time. Why has Hanson been able to mount a sustained attack on 'political correctness' and why has John Howard's response been muted? The article suggests notions of identity and difference are at the centre of the recent debate - the rhetoric has highlighted the politics of division while obsuring the issues of those marginal to the mainstream
700	1		_aMCCARTHY, Politics _931068
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g57, 3, p. 79-85 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, September 1998 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070209 _b1558^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22594 _d22594
041			_aeng