000			01748naa a2200169uu 4500
001			7021320162123
003			OSt
005			20190211162614.0
008			070213s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aFEAVER, Donald _931136
245	1	0	_aA regulatory analysis of Australia's anti-dumping law and policy : _bstatutory failure or regulatory capture?
260			_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cDecember 1997
520	3		_aAnti-dumping and countervailing (AD/CVD) law and policy permits nations to impose corrective duties against unfairly traded imports found to have injured domestic industries. However, administrators of AD/CVD policy around the world are criticised for minusing the remedy as an elaborate and complex protectionist mechanism. A problem with many critical reviews is that explanations as to how misuse occurs, or at what point in the administrative process regulatory authorities are able to exercise bias, are rarely provided. In the Australian context, the task of identifying a source and opportunity for misuse is made complicated by three major forces affecting the decision-making processes of the Australian regulatory authorities, the Australian Customs Service and Australian Anti-Dumping Authority (ACS and ADA). This article exmines the influence which Australia's international obligations, government and public policy process and the Federal Court have upon the administration of AD/CVD law and policy in order to determine the degree of autonomy afforded to the ACS and ADA
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g56, 4, p. 67-77 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, December 1997 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070213 _b2016^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22666 _d22666
041			_aeng