| 000 | 01451naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 7021519291523 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20230802145455.0 | ||
| 008 | 070215s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_94904 _aHood, Christopher |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aWhich contract state?Four perspective on over-outsourcing for public services |
| 260 |
_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cSeptember 1997 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aSince the term 'contract state' was coined over 20 years ago, there has been much discussion about the scope and limits of outsourcing and contractorisation. But attempts to fix the limits of outsourceability, using approaches such as transaction - cost analysis, the identification of inherently state functions and business-strategy ideas of 'core competences' seem fated to be indeterminate. What counts as over-outsourcing or inappropriate contractorisation depends on what basic values animate 'the' contract state. The limits of outsourcing will be different according to wheter a state aims at 'steering', 'empowering', 'consumerism' or 'amoral' goals. Accordingly, a simple distinction between 'public bureaucracy state' and 'contract state' may be less important than analysis of different variants of the contract state | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g56, 3, p. 120-131 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, September 1997 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20070215 _b1929^b _cCarolina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22717 _d22717 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||