000 | 01471naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7022116163223 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211162637.0 | ||
008 | 070221s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSTONE, Bruce _931220 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aTaking 'wainc'seriously : _ban analysis of the idea and its application to west Australian politics |
260 |
_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cMarch 1997 |
||
520 | 3 | _aDuring the late 1980s and early 1990s, the term WA Inc ( or WA Incorporated) became a by-word in the West Australian community for the failings, especially in their commercial activities, of the West Australian Labor governments of that period. Despite popular and academic interest in the notion of 'WA Inc', it is arguable that the conceptual linkage between 'business' and government, once central to popular interpretations of the term, remains under-analysed. This article has two main purpose:to illuminate usage of 'WA Inc' by identifying several basic referents of the term and relating these to popular criticism of the West Australian government in the 1980s and to determine the importance of those criticisms, thereby contributing to the larger debate about capacity of government to emulate peivate sector business | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g56, 1, p. 71-81 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, March 1997 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20070221 _b1616^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c22754 _d22754 |
||
041 | _aeng |