000			01366naa a2200169uu 4500
001			7031418095023
003			OSt
005			20190211162753.0
008			070314s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aFARQUHARSON, Karen _931541
245	1	0	_aInfluencing policy transnationally : _b
260			_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cDecember 2003
520	3		_aUsing the global tobacco advocacy networks as a case study, this article argues that the Advocacy Coalition Framework (Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith 1999), which theorises how advocacy coalitions affect policymaking domestically, and Keck and Sikkink's research into transnational advocacy networks (Keck and Sikkink 1998) can provide insights into the mechanisms of how transnational advocacy networks impact both local and intergovernmental policymaking. I argue that by combining aspects of each of these approaches, all sides of a policy situation can be analysed. I contrast these approaches with the epistemic communities approach (Haas 1992), suggesting that, for the tobacco policy system, the epistemic communities approach provides less insight than the other two
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g62, 4, p. 80-92 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, December 2003 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070314 _b1809^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c23109 _d23109
041			_aeng