000			01676naa a2200169uu 4500
001			7031419294723
003			OSt
005			20190211162802.0
008			070314s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aCHEN, Peter _931557
245	1	0	_aAdvocating online censorship
260			_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cJune 2003
520	3		_aUsing Sabatier's Advocacy Coalition Framework, the development of the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Online Services) Act 1999 is presented. Introduced to control the flow of online content (especially pornography) into and within Australia, this policy area incorporates a mix of high technology, morality and commercial interests. Analysis of the development of the Act is presented over five periods that show: the activation and formation of competing coalitions; acquisition of information and arguments about what form (if any) government regulation should take; and the relative importance of the issue. Analysis shows a number of relatively stable advocacy coalitions formed rapidly in response to government moves for regulation. The stability of these coalitions was significantly influenced by shor -term changes in regulatory technology and the nature of the political discourse used by the government which raised or lowered the 'temperature' of subsystem conflict. The article makes a number of methodological comments about the application of multivariate clustering to subsystem analysis
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g62, 2, p. 41-64 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, June 2003 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070314 _b1929^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c23126 _d23126
041			_aeng