000 | 01256naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7031916481023 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211162842.0 | ||
008 | 070319s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMULGAN, Richard _97551 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aGovernment accountability for outsourced services |
260 |
_aOxford : _bBlackwell Publishers Limited, _cJune 2006 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe effect of outsourcing on government accountability for public services continues to be contested. Analysts point to an accountability deficit while governments insist that accountability is retained (and indeed improved). The existence of an accountability deficit is confirmed, using examples from the Commonwealth Job Network. The government claim, that accountability remains, is best interpreted as rhetorical, as a refusal to shift blame to private contractors, even though some channels of accountability may be weakened. The claim can be seen as evidence of an increasing incorporation of private contractors into the overall structure of government | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration _g65, 2, p. 48-58 _dOxford : Blackwell Publishers Limited, June 2006 _xISSN 0313-6647 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20070319 _b1648^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c23248 _d23248 |
||
041 | _aeng |