000			02087naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7052317315810
003			OSt
005			20190211162944.0
008			070523s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKIM, Seoyong _931953
245	1	0	_aIrresolvable cultural conflicts and conservation / development arguments : _banalysis of Korea´s Saemangeum project
260			_aDordrecht, Netherlands : _bSpringer, _cJune 2003
520	3		_aThis paper examines, through argument analysis & grid-group model, how cultural bias, as the frame of reference of an advocacy coalition (AC), brings about irresolvable conflicts and produces divided arguments between coalitions for development and conservation in Koreas Saemangeum project. Based on different cultural biases, two ACs – the advocacy coalition for development (ACD) and the advocacy coalition for conservation (ACC) – interpreted the same facts differently in line with their cultural orientations and ways of life. The dynamic argument patterns reflected each coalitions cultural bias, which restricted the frame of reference of actors in each AC. After reviewing argument analysis as an analytic tool, we introduce cultural theoryin which ways of life, consisting of cultural biases and social relations, amplify the irresolvable conflicts between two ACs. Second, to show the culturally constructed nature of the conflicts, we analyze the contrasting arguments between the ACD (dominated by a hierarchy bias) and ACC (led by egalitarianism) in the Saemangeum project. Third, we discuss the implications of Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavskys cultural theoryto advocacy coalition framework (ACF) as follows: 1) constraining effects on inter-coalitional learning by cultural biases, 2) coexistence of different solidarities under a coalition, and 3) asymmetric relationships between parties in a coalition
773	0	8	_tPolicy Sciences _g36, 2, p. 125-149 _dDordrecht, Netherlands : Springer, June 2003 _xISSN 0032-2867 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070523 _b1731^b _cTiago
998			_a20070604 _b1426^b _cZailton
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c23592 _d23592
041			_aeng