000			01730naa a2200181uu 4500
001			7052318032610
003			OSt
005			20190211162945.0
008			070523s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHAJER, Maarten _931956
245	1	0	_aPolicy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void
260			_aDordrecht, Netherlands : _bSpringer, _cJune 2003
520	3		_aHow should policy analysis respond to the changing context of policy making? This article examines three aspects of policy analysis in this changing context: polity, knowledge and intervention. It argues that policy making now often takes place in an institutional void where there are no generally accepted rules and norms according to which politics is to be conducted and policy measures are to be agreed upon. More than before, solutions for pressing problems transgress the sovereignty of specific polities. Furthermore, the role of knowledge changes as the relationship between science and society has changed: scientific expertise is now negotiated rather than simply accepted. And, with the weakening of the state, it is far less obvious that the government is the sole actor to intervene in policy making. This article calls for a reconsideration of the analysis of policy making in the light of this changing context. Based on a contextual perspective it calls for a revitalization of the commitments of Harold Lasswell toward a policy science of democracy by proposing a new deliberative policy analysis
773	0	8	_tPolicy Sciences _g36, 2, p. 175-195 _dDordrecht, Netherlands : Springer, June 2003 _xISSN 0032-2867 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070523 _b1803^b _cTiago
998			_a20070604 _b1427^b _cZailton
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c23595 _d23595
041			_aeng