000			01665naa a2200217uu 4500
001			7082015004823
003			OSt
005			20220916062544.0
008			070820s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_98951 _aRiccucci, Norma M.
245	1	0	_aMoving away from a strict scrutiny standard for affirmative action : _bimplications for public management
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSage Publications, _cJun. 2007
520	3		_aThis article addresses the concept of strict scrutiny, the burden of persuasion test used by the courts to determine the constitutionality of affirmative action. Through a systematic analysis of U.S. Supreme Court decisions, it illustrates that strict scrutiny has been applied in an inconsistent, arbitrary manner and, therefore, should not serve as the basis for judicial review of affirmative action programs. It shows that the rule of law established under the Civil Rights Act provides an equally if not more compelling basis for judging the legality of affirmative action programs. Relying on the legal standards advanced by the courts under civil rights statutes provides managers with greater flexibility in developing and implementing affirmative action programs. In effect, the ability of governments to promote diversity of their workforces is greatly enhanced
650		4	_911965 _aPolítica Social
650		4	_aParticipação Social _911973
650		4	_aTerceiro Setor _913013
773	0	8	_tThe American Review of Public Administration _g37, 2, p. 123-141 _dThousand Oaks : Sage Publications, Jun. 2007 _xISSN 0275-0740 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070820 _b1500^b _cCarolina
998			_a20101216 _b1711^b _cKeicielle
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c24391 _d24391
041			_aeng