000 | 01778naa a2200241uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7082015243123 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211163104.0 | ||
008 | 070820s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aVOGELSANG-COOMBS, Vera _932559 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aMayoral leadership and facilitative governance |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSage Publications, _cJune 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis analysis offers a contingency model of mayoral leadership based on a long view of a city's institutional context and substantive interests. This model generates four distinct governance types or styles of mayoral administration—populism, progressivism, constitutionalism, and managerialism. The author uses empirical evidence drawn from familiar mayoral administrations to analyze shifts within and across these governance types. By integrating normative public administration into the dynamics of urban governance, this model yields robust findings concerning mayoral—regime relationships. The author concludes that the renewal of a fiscally stressed big city is in facilitative governance. Facilitative governance blends managerialism and constitutionalism, whereas its normative basis is democratic conservatorship. By activating the ethos of public administration, a mayoral conservator facilitates the regime conditions necessary for economic, political, and social inclusion | |
650 | 4 |
_amayoral leadership _932560 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aregime politics _932561 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aAtlanta _932562 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aCleveland _932563 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aChicago Indianapolis _932564 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tThe American Review of Public Administration _g37, 2, p. 198-225 _dThousand Oaks : Sage Publications, June 2007 _xISSN 0275-0740 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20070820 _b1524^b _cCarolina |
||
998 |
_a20081112 _b1046^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c24394 _d24394 |
||
041 | _aeng |