000 01851naa a2200277uu 4500
001 7082415545123
003 OSt
005 20190211163124.0
008 070824s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aBOWMAN, Diana M.
_932615
245 1 0 _aEngaging in small talk :
_b
260 _aCarlton :
_bBlackwell Publishers Asia Pty Ltd,
_cJune 2007
520 3 _aThis article discusses the phenomena of nanotechnology, and notes that despite high investment levels for global research and development, the public presently understands neither the implications of this emerging technology nor how it might be best governed. It considers the notion of the public interest and its place in the public policy cycle, and notes some of the specific challenges posed by this new technology. Adopting a comparative jurisdictional approach, this article maps a range of policy and dialogue activities currently underway within the United Kingdom and Australia and concludes that policy dialogue is an essential component of public policy development for all emerging technologies. While the Australian government is currently beginning this process, compared to countries such as the United Kingdom, such efforts here are still embryonic. A fuller engagement in wide-ranging public debate is suggested as a part of protecting the public interest
650 4 _aGestão Tecnológica
_912029
650 4 _aTecnologia
_912882
650 4 _aPolítica Pública
_912838
650 4 _aInteresse Público
_911962
651 4 _aOceania
_912932
651 4 _aAustrália
_912933
651 4 _aReino Unido
_913171
700 1 _aHODGE, Graeme A
_932616
773 0 8 _tAustralian Journal of Public Administration-AJPA
_g66, 2, p. 223-237
_dCarlton : Blackwell Publishers Asia Pty Ltd, June 2007
_xISSN 0313-6647
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20070824
_b1554^b
_cCarolina
998 _a20071031
_b1509^b
_cTiago
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c24429
_d24429
041 _aeng