000			02032naa a2200205uu 4500
001			7092519062910
003			OSt
005			20190211163133.0
008			070925s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGREENAWAY, John _94324
245	1	0	_aHow policy networks can damage democratic health : _ba case study in the government of governance
260			_aCanberra, Austrália : _bBlackwell Publishing, _cAugust 2007
520	3		_aThis article examines a detailed case study of implementation networks in England using the example of the relocation of the Norfolk and Norwich hospital, which became a flagship PFI project for the Labour government after 1997. The case study illustrates the workings of the new order of multi-layered governance with both local and national networks from different policy areas interacting. However, it also sheds light on the governance debate and illustrates how in the world of new public management, powerful actors, or policy entrepreneurs, with their own agenda, still have the facility, by exercising power and authority, to shape and determine the policy outputs through implementation networks. It is argued that, whereas policy networks are normally portrayed as enriching and promoting pluralist democratic processes, implementation networks in multi-layered government can also undermine democratic accountability. Four aspects here are pertinent: (1) the degree of central government power; (2) local elite domination; (3) the fragmentation of responsibility; and (4) the dynamics of decision making which facilitates the work of policy entrepreneurs. All these factors illustrate the importance of ‘the government of governance’ in the British state
700	1		_aSALTER, Brian _923913
700	1		_aHART, Stella _932746
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g85, 3, p. 717-738 _dCanberra, Austrália : Blackwell Publishing, August 2007 _xISSN 0033-3298 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20070925 _b1906^b _cTiago
998			_a20070926 _b1532^b _cZailton
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c24599 _d24599
041			_aeng