| 000 | 01860naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 7092519225610 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211163135.0 | ||
| 008 | 070925s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aFINK-HAFNER, Danica _932751 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEuropeanization in managing EU affairs : _bbetween divergence and convergence, a comparative study of Estonia, Hungary and Slovenia |
| 260 |
_aCanberra, Austrália : _bBlackwell Publishing, _cAugust 2007 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aScholarly research into Estonia, Hungary and Slovenia has shown that the idiosyncrasies of the new EU countries (especially with respect to institutionalizing and centralizing the co-ordination of core executives in managing EU affairs at home) persist. They are complemented by trends toward convergence (such as growing co-ordination efforts and a common tendency: that of the prime minister to be the centre of co-ordination). In this article external Europeanization pressures, national administrative traditions (the legacies of both pre-communist and communist systems), and the patterns of party competition that cause variations in politico-administrative relations, are tested as possible explanatory variables of differences seen in the three countries when managing EU affairs. While national administrative traditions play similar roles to those seen in old(er) member states by filtering the EUs impacts, the effect of patterns of party competition on politico-administrative relations when managing EU affairs has been filtered by the accession states national priorities of integrating with the EU | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration: an international quarterly _g85, 3, p. 805-828 _dCanberra, Austrália : Blackwell Publishing, August 2007 _xISSN 0033-3298 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20070925 _b1922^b _cTiago |
||
| 998 |
_a20070926 _b1533^b _cZailton |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c24603 _d24603 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||