000			01384naa a2200193uu 4500
001			7100415271310
003			OSt
005			20190211163149.0
008			071004s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aHOAGLAND, G. William _932828
245	1	0	_aA Comment on "The Great Unraveling : _bfederal budgeting, 1998-2006"
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cjuly / aug. 2007
520	3		_aTo declare that the federal budgetary process is in utter shambles based principally on an analysis of a six-year interval during a single presidential administration, as Professor Irene Rubin does in the preceding article, is unfair to history and misleading. Drawing on significant budgetary experience as a U.S. Senate staff member, the author of this essay argues that (1) the contributions of emergency appropriations and earmarks to the federal budgetary imbalance are overstated, (2) the goal of perpetual budgetary balance is unsound policy, and (3) budgets—inevitably the result of a political process—are artifacts reflecting societal priorities at a given point in time
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g67, 4, p. 618-623 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, july / aug. 2007 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20071004 _b1527^b _cTiago
998			_a20090608 _b1631^b _cmayze
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c24676 _d24676
041			_aeng