000			01887naa a2200205uu 4500
001			7100917254410
003			OSt
005			20190211163210.0
008			071009s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMATHUR, Navdeep _932883
245	1	0	_aEvaluating democratic performance : _bmethodologies for assessing the relationship between network governance and citizens
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cMarch / April 2007
520	3		_aNetwork governance can enhance democratic practice by furnishing new routes for actors to deliberate, make, and execute public policy. But it is hindered by a lack of political oversight, limited democratic competence of new organizational forms, and informality of operation. Little research has been conducted on the democratic performance of governance networks, and the methodology is poorly developed. Quality-of-democracy studies of national governmental and political systems offer a starting point. Their criteria-based method is useful in accessing the democratic "hardware" of formal entities, such as partnerships and hybrids, but it does not enable data to be gathered on democratic "software"—the informal day-to-day practices of actors in networks. Interpretive approaches offer a way forward. Narrative analysis, qualitative interviews using a criteria-based instrument, and Q-methodology provide routes into democratic software. They enable the researcher to move beyond the analysis of institutional nodes and to understand the democratic performance of the wider governance network
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
700	1		_aSKELCHER, Chris _918310
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g67, 2, p. 228-237 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, March / April 2007 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20071009 _b1725^b _cTiago
998			_a20090608 _b1724^b _cmayze
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c24744 _d24744
041			_aeng