| 000 | 01569naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 7101015250710 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211163215.0 | ||
| 008 | 071010s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aHICKLIN, Alisa _932895 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aThe Effect of race-based admissions in public universities : _bdebunking the myths about hopwood and proposition 209 |
| 260 |
_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cMarch / April 2007 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aIn the debates over the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decisions regarding race-based university admissions, speculation has focused on how affirmative action affects minority undergraduate enrollments. This paper uses a rational choice framework to test the conventional wisdom about the effect of race-based admissions, focusing on the landmark Hopwood judicial decision and Californias Proposition 209. This study offers more generalizable findings by incorporating all public universities bound under Hopwood and Proposition 209 using data spanning 19902000. Findings indicate that the effect of race-based admissions standards is not what might have been predicted: Shifts in minority enrollments that are attributable to affirmative action hinge on university-specific characteristicsnamely, the level of selectivity | |
| 590 | _aPublic administration review PAR | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g67, 2, p. 331-340 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, March / April 2007 _xISSN 00333352 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20071010 _b1525^b _cTiago |
||
| 998 |
_a20090608 _b1735^b _cmayze |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c24761 _d24761 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||