| 000 | 01558naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 7113016585810 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211163308.0 | ||
| 008 | 071130s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aSTRUENING, Karen _933186 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aDo government sponsored marriage promotion policies place undue pressure on individual rights? |
| 260 |
_aDordrecht, Netherlands : _bSpringer, _cSeptember 2007 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThe dominance of social science research in the debate over the Bush Administrations Healthy Marriage Initiative may explain why questions regarding the proper role of government in regulating adult intimacy have received little attention. Social science research focuses on outcomes such as well-being and health. In contrast, rights-based legal theory considers whether state action undermines the rights of individuals. In this article, I intend to shift the debate over marriage promotion policy from questions of child well-being to questions of individual rights. I will ask the following questions: Do individuals have a liberty interest in making their own choices about intimate relationships, such as marriage? Do federally-financed (and frequently state-run) marriage programs compromise this liberty interest? Are there any constitutional grounds for objecting to marriage promotion policy? | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPolicy Sciences _g40, 3, p. 241-259 _dDordrecht, Netherlands : Springer, September 2007 _xISSN 00322687 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20071130 _b1658^b _cTiago |
||
| 998 |
_a20071130 _b1722^b _cTiago |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25149 _d25149 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||