000			01465naa a2200217uu 4500
001			7120318022719
003			OSt
005			20190212105701.0
008			071203s2003 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100	1		_aARIENTI, Wagner Leal _933195
245	1	0	_aDo Estado Keynesiano ao Estado Schumpeteriano
260			_aSão Paulo : _bEditora 34, _cout./dez. 2003
520	3		_aThis critique aims to introduce Jessop's hypotheses on post-Fordist state. Based on regulation approach, the Keynesian and welfare state is taken as the ideal type state that underpinned the Fordist accumulation regime until 1970s. In order to response to the crises of Fordism and Keynesian state, new policies have been directed to reform state apparatus and policies. The Jessop's main hypothesis is that a 'hollowed-out' Schumpeterian workfare state is the best form to support the post-Fordist transition. In spite of pointing out some problems, the paper calls attention for the heuristic values of Jessop's hypotheses on post-Fordist state and their potentialities to guide case studies
590			_aRevista de Economia Política v.23 n.4
590			_aOutubro-Dezembro 2003
590			_av. 26, n. 4(92)
773	0	8	_tRevista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy _g23, 4 , p. 97-113 _dSão Paulo : Editora 34, out./dez. 2003 _xISSN 01013157 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20071203 _b1802^b _cMariana
998			_a20140204 _b1500^b _ckarina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25162 _d25162
041			_apor