| 000 | 01624naa a2200217uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 7121216263510 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211163326.0 | ||
| 008 | 071212s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aSEARING, Donald D. _916656 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPublic discussion in the deliberative system : _bdoes it make better citizens? |
| 260 |
_aCambridge, UK : _bCambridge University Press, _cOctober 2007 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aIn democratic theory, the practice of discussing public affairs has been associated with desirable consequences for citizenship and democracy. We use Anglo-American survey data to examine twelve hypotheses about psychological foundations for four general conditions that such discussions might promote: autonomous citizens, political legitimacy, good representation and democratic communities. Our data combine detailed measures of public discussion with measures of more of its hypothesized civic consequences than have heretofore been available. They also enable us to probe, using specialized samples, causal inferences suggested by our analyses of random samples in our British and American communities. Six of the hypotheses are supported, including at least one regarding each of the four general liberal democratic conditions we investigate | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aSOLT, Frederick _921974 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aCONOVER, Pamela Johnston _933330 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aCREWE, Ivor _933331 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g37, 4, p. 587-618 _dCambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, October 2007 _xISSN 00071234 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20071212 _b1626^b _cTiago |
||
| 998 |
_a20081031 _b1049^b _cZailton |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25300 _d25300 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||