000 | 01133naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7121216362010 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211163327.0 | ||
008 | 071212s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aVERMEULE, Adrian _933333 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aAbsolute majority rules |
260 |
_aCambridge, UK : _bCambridge University Press, _cOctober 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis article considers absolute majority rules, which require the affirmative vote of a majority of all those eligible to vote in the institution. I compare absolute majority rules to simple majority rules under which only those present and voting are counted, and to simple supermajority rules. Under plausible conditions, absolute majority rules prove superior. Absolute majority rules insure majorities against strategic behaviour by minorities and combine supermajoritarian effects with majoritarian symbolism | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tBritish Journal of Political Science _g37, 4, p. 643-658 _dCambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, October 2007 _xISSN 00071234 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20071212 _b1636^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20081031 _b1049^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25302 _d25302 |
||
041 | _aeng |