000			01792naa a2200205uu 4500
001			7121720210619
003			OSt
005			20190212105847.0
008			071217s2001 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100	1		_aOREIRO, José Luiz _933391
245	1	0	_aTexa de juror, preferência pela liquidez e fundos de empréstimo : _buma análise crítica das tentativas de demonstração da equivalência entre a teorias dos fundos de empréstimos e de preferência pela liquidez
260			_aSão Paulo : _bEditora 34, _cabr./jun. 2001
520	3		_aThis article presents the atempts to demonstrate the equivalence between loanable funds and liquidity preference theories of interest rate done by Hicks, Lerner, Tsiang and Patinkin in order to show that these attempts were not suceed. That is so because these atempts had started from wrong conceptions about what are the issues under discussion in the debate between loanable funds and liquidity preference theories or because they had misrepresented one or another of both theories. In fact, the atempts done by Hicks and Patinkin desconsider the fact that what is essential in this debate was the mechanism by which saving and investment decisions have influence in the determination of interest rate. By the other side, the atempts of Lerner and Tsiang misrepresent the relation between saving and investment and the finance motive of demand for money that is supposed by both theories
590			_aRevista de Economia Política 2001
590			_av. 21, n. 2(82)
773	0	8	_tRevista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy _g21, 2 , p. 117-133 _dSão Paulo : Editora 34, abr./jun. 2001 _xISSN 01013157 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20071217 _b2021^b _cMariana
998			_a20140206 _b1124^b _ckarina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25363 _d25363
041			_apor