000 | 01740naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 7121720335019 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190212105848.0 | ||
008 | 071217s2001 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLOUÇÃ, Francisco _933392 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDeterminismo e livre arbítrio nas ciências sociais : _bcontributos matemáticos |
260 |
_aSão Paulo : _bEditora 34, _cabr./jun. 2001 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe paper surveys some of the powerful criticisms developed against the paradigm of general equilibrium, in particular those that were presented from the view point of new insights from mathematics and physics. Maxwell, Duhem, Poincaré, Hurst and Mandelbrot, as many others, contrasted the universe of simplicity the basis for the central limit theorem and most of traditional statistical inference with the universe of organized complexity, arguing that auto-poiesis and coordination are indeed general features of our physical or social systems. The impact of these discussions in economics is then presented, since some criticisms to the theory of general equilibrium and in particular to the Cowles Commission programme emerged from this intuition on complexity: Sims, Granger, Wold, Hendry and other economists, statisticians or mathematicians expressed their reservations in relation to the orthodox tradition and culture in our science. The current heterodox strategies are discussed in the last part of the paper | |
590 | _av. 21, n. 2(82) | ||
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy _g21, 2 , p. 154-176 _dSão Paulo : Editora 34, abr./jun. 2001 _xISSN 01013157 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20071217 _b2033^b _cMariana |
||
998 |
_a20140206 _b1131^b _ckarina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25365 _d25365 |
||
041 | _apor |