000 01762naa a2200205uu 4500
001 8010812151819
003 OSt
005 20190212105920.0
008 080108s2000 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100 1 _aANDRADE, Rogerio P. de
_933421
245 1 0 _aA agenda do keynesianismo filosófico :
_borigens e perspectivas
260 _aSão Paulo :
_bEditora 34,
_cabr./jun. 2000
520 3 _aThis paper addresses what I label Philosophical Keynesianism, mapping out its historical and analytical origins and pointing out its perspectives as an alternative bench-mark. Its historical emergence is related to some theoretical and methodologi-cal research results within the post-Keynesian school of economic thought. An assump-tion is made as to the proper place Philosophical Keynesianism will have in the future, for its scope of investigation is becoming much more comprehensive and inclusive than the economic school which engendered it. The paper reviews some major contribu-tions of this new field of inquiry, such as the books of Carabelli, O’Donnell and Davis. It also seeks to reinforce the case that, as it is quite clear from Keynes’ approach to economic theorizing, economics should be seen as a moral and socio-historical sci-ence rather than a natural science, and that a more realistic and relevant study of economic phenomena should be grounded on some sort of interdisciplinary research
590 _aRevista de Economia Política 2000
590 _av. 20, n. 2(78)
773 0 8 _tRevista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
_g20, 2 , p. 76-94
_dSão Paulo : Editora 34, abr./jun. 2000
_xISSN 01013157
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20080108
_b1215^b
_cMariana
998 _a20140207
_b0959^b
_ckarina
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c25405
_d25405
041 _apor